Warp escribió:
> Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:
>> Hmm... Looks like there are some C++ wrappers around MPFR that would 
>> make it quite simpler. And when I say simpler, I mean that in many 
>> cases, replacing 'double' with 'mpfr_class' would be all (who said 
>> operator overloading was bad?)
> 
>   There may be wrappers, but are they efficient?

Using MPFR wouldn't be efficient in the first place (compared to plain 
old doubles), so...

Post a reply to this message