|
|
"Vincent Le Chevalier" <gal### [at] libertyALLsurfSPAMfr> wrote in
message news:47e3b123$1@news.povray.org...
>> Laugh if you like, I don't mind, but the solution is clockwork cars.
>>
>> The factory produces a clockwork 'engine' with two pre-wound springs
>> in the car. You go buy it, and drive it off the forecourt. As you drive
>> it, only one spring drives the car, and when that spring winds down
>> enough not to work effectively, the other one kicks in to continue the
>> journey. Here's the good bit: As the second spring is driving you
>> forward, it re-winds the first spring, so this would work in such a way
>> that they would forever be swapping over and eliminating any hands on
>> winding up.
>>
>
> But this cannot work... When spring 1 is wound down completely, you have
> only the energy of one fully wound up spring left. If you use it to
> totally wind up spring 1 again, then you cannot use it to move the car. So
> sooner or later, you'll have to wind the car up again, to re-inject energy
> that has been lost while moving. The fact that there is one or two or n
> springs does not change anything...
Well, ok, but what if the back springs were just rewound by the drive of
forward motion (and not from the front two springs) anyway?
>
> So we're back to waiting for the Apocalypse again :-)
And 'waiting' is the key word there. ;)
~Steve~
>
> --
> Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
|