Warp a écrit :
> stbenge <stb### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> I don't find it too difficult to delete every "new".
>
> You would be surprised.
> No 'new' -> no leaks.
>
Hey, but there are 'new's in the standard lib :-)
I think it would be more informative to give fixes that do not rely on
the standard library... After all the 'new' operator exists for a
reason, you don't always want to use the standard lib, and knowing what
to do in these cases is useful.
No I won't do it as I'm not even sure I know where the leak is in the
first case :-)
--
Vincent
Post a reply to this message
|
