|
|
Warp wrote:
> Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> I'd venture to say C# also has an astounding amount of libraries (at
>> least, on the Windows platform ...) the base library for .NET is pretty
>> extensive, though not without limitations, but those can easily be
>> worked around. I don't know whether the base libraries for Mono are as
>> plentiful, as I only have very limited experience with Mono.
>
>> The drawback? It's not viewed as a high performance language.
>
> And rather Windows-only.
Isn't that the whole point of the Mono project?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|