Chambers wrote:
> Absolutely, and I mean that quite literally.

I think portability isn't a binary quality.  You seem to be saying that 
any turing-complete language is equally portable because you could write 
an interpreter for it in some other language.  So why do people complain 
about C# being microsoft-only? :-)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message