> 
> There are occasional outliers of course - for instance images with a 
> moderately good artistic note and so-so concept - but on the whole having 
> several voting categories is more intellectually satisfying than 
> statistically meaningful.

I wholeheartedly agree.

As a numerous-times IRTC participant, I've been mostly annoyed
by these useless 3 categories, and, personnally, I had the habit
to put the 3 same notes each time.

Advice : get a general ranking with a single note, and use a small jury
to attribute artistic, technical and concept merits.  Makes more sense.

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message