> Warp wrote:
> 
>>   You seem to refuse to accept that modern software *does more* than 10
>> years old software. You always talk as if they did the *exact same 
>> thing*,
>> just much more slowly.
> 
> OK, so can anybody name anything that Word can do now that it couldn't 
> before?
> 
> Hmm, let me see.
> 
> - It has grammer checking now.
> 
> - It does mail merge.
> 
> - It has macros.
> 
> - Er... WordArt?
> 
> - Erm... no, I'm done here.
> 
> Not sure why any of those things should make it so vastly slower...
> 

WordArt sure was slow as hell on the 33MHz computers we had at school 
(rendering speed looked like it was raytracing the damn things), but 
nope, I see no reason why it would make other things slower if you 
*don't* use that feature.

Post a reply to this message