Chambers wrote:
> Here's a novel thought: do we really need more than one category?  Why 
> not just have one score, and let that be that?  After all, is it really 
> worthwhile to say, "Well, *this* picture was extremely difficult for the 
> author to make because of the method he used, so the fact that he pulled 
> it off makes up for it's being a lousy image"?

We'd get a 1st 2nd and 3rd favorite pictures and no honorable mentions. 
  It'd be a single dimensional contest which doesn't sound quite as 
interesting to me anyway.  I suppose we don't all value the same things, 
and a single category would give the most freedom to each voter to vote 
for whichever reasons they think are valid.  Keeping more categories 
could catch more participant interest though.
Charles

Post a reply to this message