|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:42:35 -0400, David Buck wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
>> David Buck wrote:
>>> Your thoughts would be appreciated.
>>
>> Might be too late to mention this, but I've always felt that a 5-point
>> score system is easier for users :)
>
> A 5 point system is just as easy to implement as a 10 point system. I'm
> open to this suggestion if people think it's the best way.
From an implementation standpoint, the difference isn't significant - but
from the standpoint of a user, what's the difference between a "7" and an
"8", for example, on a scale of 9 or 10 points?
This is a question I've been trying to answer for course evaluations in
my "real life" job for a couple of years now. From the standpoint of
what type of scale to use, an odd-number scale works best (I find),
because there is actually a middle number in the scale (assuming an
integer scale). I use a 9-point scale (because that's what's been in
place more than anything) - 5 becomes a "neutral" score in that case.
Just something to think about.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |