|
|
Warp wrote:
> Why does it need to be so complicated?
> find /tmp/stuff -name "*.tmp" -exec rm {} \;
> It *does* work, assuming you have a sufficiently modern shell (and not
> a 20 years old sh). Modern shells are rather smart at escaping what needs
> to be escaped when you write "*".
In other words, if you completely bypass the shell, it can be made easy
to work. Otherwise you get things like "no such user John.tmp" when you
try to delete "~John.tmp". And if you want to delete all the files in
the directory, you have to add more escaping. And if you want to scp
them to a different server, you really don't want to be typing the
password for each one, so you either have to use xargs (with the -0
switch, which is why that's there!) or manage to tar them up somehow,
which has the same problems.
Anyway, my point was that it's kind of unobvious to get right, not that
it couldn't be done. I generally just break out Tcl for such a task
(since Tcl doesn't reparse things repeatedly without you asking
explicitly), as it's easier than trying to come up with the right list
of flags to the various programs.
Yet every time I mention the kinds of problems it causes, the UNIX
dweebs *I* know will fight to the death their need to be able to put
backspaces and vertical tab characters into file names. You might as
well try to convince a FORTH programmer that it isn't necessary to have
the ability to start the name of a function with a closing parenthesis.
</rant> :-)
Having the shell doing your expansion has caught me other times, too...
% cat a b c >d
Can't create d: permission denied
% sudo !!
Can't create d: permission denied
Of course, the real line was much longer, so a simple "su" meant
retyping the line (or using copy-and-paste to retype it for you) instead
of just !! or up-arrow. :-)
However, I'm glad Windows finally forced people writing Unix shells to
start dealing with funky file names as a regular occurrence. ;-) I
noticed that the shells started learning to do proper quoting (like for
command-line completion) right around the time SAMBA shares with
MSWindows servers got popular. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|