Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   That would be a 486, yes. It worked in a 386, but 486 was recommended.

> Actually, I'm kind of amused. I realized the files in the boot partition 
> for my Linux are bigger than you could put on the biggest hard drive 
> available for the IBM AT.

  I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to say.

  (Are you expecting linux to do the same things it's doing now but only
use a tiny amount of disk space? How do you expect it to do that miracle?)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message