Warp wrote:
>   That would be a 486, yes. It worked in a 386, but 486 was recommended.

Actually, I'm kind of amused. I realized the files in the boot partition 
for my Linux are bigger than you could put on the biggest hard drive 
available for the IBM AT.

Then again, I can comfortably fit a memory chip with several orders of 
magnitude more storage than the IBM AT could handle up my nose.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message