>> As you can see, the two signals correlate reasonably closely. As you 
>> can *also* see, they're not exactly identical by any stretch. Hmm... I 
>> think my program is buggy. :-S
>>
> As this Fractal Transform is not lossless, what exactly is your problem?

I was hoping for a closer fit than that.

Mind you, I started out applying this to image data. Only problem is 
that the decompressed image bears *no resemblance* to the original. I 
don't know what I've done wrong, but it's clearly horrifically broken. 
So I thought I'd try the simpler 1-dimenional 1-channel case. And as you 
can see, it more or less works...

> Other than that it is apparently the wrong compression technique for 
> this kind of signal of course.

Or rather, I couldn't find a good signal to test it with. ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message