> Unfortunately in 3.6 passing values by parameter is buggy,
> it's fixed in the 3.7 beta, but in general you probably shouldn't
> rely on values being returned correctly via parameter.
> 
Just for curiosity sake, do you mean in general programming, or only in 
SDL (and why)?

At the end, i read that a parameter (in programming) is just a variable 
stored in the stack (and recovered later).

Post a reply to this message