Chris Cason wrote:
> Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>> Well, your idea certainly is possible (even though recall it is a binary 
>> tree and building requires lots of memory), but as Chris said earlier, we 
>> are not looking for new feature implementations right now. We are still 
>> looking for people to work on the various open issues and incomplete 
>> features... ;-)
> 
> Yes, but it *is* an interesting problem, is it not? <grin>

Well, splitting the tree is rather trivial, the overhead in the tight code 
might be too costly.

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message