|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> Well, your idea certainly is possible (even though recall it is a binary
> tree and building requires lots of memory), but as Chris said earlier, we
> are not looking for new feature implementations right now. We are still
> looking for people to work on the various open issues and incomplete
> features... ;-)
Yes, but it *is* an interesting problem, is it not? <grin>
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|