|
 |
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:06:39 -0500, Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> > You're probably right about going the linux route but which kernel? I
>> > know for certain that it won't run 2.6.22 :-))
>
>> I'd probably go with a 2.0 or a 2.2 kernel - something like DSL or one
>> of the other minimalist Linux distros should come with one of those
>> older kernels.
>
> Does anyone actually have a reference to 2.6 not supporting 386?
I don't, and I'm sure it does work, but the memory requirements are
typically higher for the newer kernels, so an older kernel is often
preferred.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
