> Darren New wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> That's an implementation bug. Invisible is talking about AWT 
>>> *design*, which can't be just "fixed on the next release".
>>
>> Yes. He was changing the topic, and I was still on the original topic. 
>> :-) Just saying, AWT wasn't the worst of it. Java had all kinds of 
>> evil brokenness, and still does.
> 
> So does .Net have a less horribly broken library design then?
> 

AFAIK, The library for making windows and stuff is less broken than Java 
AWT, *because* it's too Windows-oriented. Since they didn't bother with 
any crossplatformness, the API is simpler...

Post a reply to this message