Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>>   Because it's not a feature of the functional programming paradigm,
>> but the imperative programming paradigm.
> 
> Huh?  Since when?  I think you're mistaken here, but I'm happy to learn 
> otherwise.

As posted elsewhere, what Warp *really* means is "arrays with in-place 
update". Which *is* strictly speaking against functional style. (But 
that doesn't stop you using it even in a pure functional language such 
as Haskell...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message