On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:17:04 -0300, nemesis wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:01:25 -0300, nemesis wrote:
>>> People's opinions on whether something is photorealistic is irrelevant
>>> as to whether it is or not.  The only way to test it out would be to
>>> take a photo, model a scene similar to it and render.  Then diff the
>>> render and the photo.
>> You might opt to take a - shall we say - religious view towards your
>> correctness; that doesn't mean you're right. ;-)
> 
> I'd say that's a technical stance.

You measure photorealism in one way - and that's fine.  Doesn't mean 
that's the way everyone measures it.

For one thing, your view of photorealism depends on the scene actually 
being able to be photographed.  So, for example, how would you do a 
photorealism check on, say, Battlestar Pegasus?

Jim

Post a reply to this message