nemesis wrote:

> 
> I didn't say "better".  I said "more photorealistic".  And they are.
> 
> Perhaps, yes, more artistic license and less photorealism may yield 
> better looking pictures.

I seem to remember a certain image created by a certain member here that 
fooled plenty of people into thinking it was a photo. I takes skill and 
talent, but it can be done.

I think the term you're intending to use here is "more physically 
accurate", which will generally yield photorealistic results.

Post a reply to this message