On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:02:34 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:

>>>  But for creating "photorealistic" rendered images, my bets
>>> are still on raytracers
>> 
>> this is pure fanboyism.  Those images look far more photorealistic than
>> most povray renders, despite their users not being geeks constantly
>> tweaking a text file.
> 
> Irony, much?
> 
> You say it's pure prejustice, and then post an unsubstanciated rant
> that, in your own opinion, unbaised renders all look "better". Hmm.
> Cute.
> 
> If you think unbaised renderers are better, you're entitled to your
> opinion. Just stop saying that anybody who dares to disagree is
> automatically a "fanboy".

Nicely said, Andy.  Couldn't have said it better myself. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message