Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>>  But for creating "photorealistic" rendered images, my bets
>>> are still on raytracers
>>
>> this is pure fanboyism.  Those images look far more photorealistic 
>> than most povray renders, despite their users not being geeks 
>> constantly tweaking a text file.
> 
> Irony, much?
> 
> You say it's pure prejustice, and then post an unsubstanciated rant 
> that, in your own opinion, unbaised renders all look "better". Hmm. Cute.

I didn't say "better".  I said "more photorealistic".  And they are.

Perhaps, yes, more artistic license and less photorealism may yield 
better looking pictures.

Post a reply to this message