> Mike Raiford wrote:
>>  But for creating "photorealistic" rendered images, my bets
>> are still on raytracers
> 
> this is pure fanboyism.  Those images look far more photorealistic than 
> most povray renders, despite their users not being geeks constantly 
> tweaking a text file.

I'm a povray fanboy and proud of it. So what.

Post a reply to this message