|
|
>> But for creating "photorealistic" rendered images, my bets
>> are still on raytracers
>
> this is pure fanboyism. Those images look far more photorealistic than
> most povray renders, despite their users not being geeks constantly
> tweaking a text file.
Irony, much?
You say it's pure prejustice, and then post an unsubstanciated rant
that, in your own opinion, unbaised renders all look "better". Hmm. Cute.
If you think unbaised renderers are better, you're entitled to your
opinion. Just stop saying that anybody who dares to disagree is
automatically a "fanboy".
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|