|
|
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:09:20 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:
>> Yeah, I think that's part of the reason it failed. Of course, his
>> other program - Harsh Realm, I think it was called - total flop.
>
> Was that one of his, I can't a preview and thought it sounded
> interesting never got broadcast on terrestrial here though.
I believe it was - Yep, IMDB shows that it was created by Carter.
>> True enough. But compared to the 1970's series, this one is I think a
>> lot better. I tried watching the old series, and just couldn't get
>> into it (though I remember really liking it, in spite of the fact that
>> they had only 3 battle "scenes").
>
> Sorry in context that should have read as 'always been a part of the new
> BSG'
:-)
>> But then again, there was also Galactica 1980, here's hoping we don't
>> see a remake of that again.
>>
>> Last night, we watched the remake of Knight Rider. Utter crap.
>> There's 2 hours of my life I'm not getting back.
>
> They remade Knight Rider - sacrilege ;-)
What's more "The Hoff" was part of it. He really should have known
better. ;-)
>> The effects weren't bad, but
>> they call *that* acting? Shit, my cats can act better than that. And
>> it got a bit too preachy for my tastes - well, it starts off with
>> scenes that looked like they could be out of Baywatch, then cut to an
>> apparent lesbian scene between one of the main characters and some
>> throwaway bimbo - but then we get scripture quoted at us partway
>> through the programme. Oh, and marriage/divorce statistics. Ho hum.
>> If I wanted a morality tale, I'd have gone to church instead.
>
> But would you have got the lesbian scene at church?
Not yet, but who knows, maybe that's coming in the series, if they
continue it.
>> I have watched 24 - the thing about that one is that it's *so*
>> farfetched it shorts my brain out and I can actually sit back and just
>> watch and enjoy the explosions. The tech is *so* far from the real
>> world that it actually kinda works for me, because I can't sit and
>> nitpick the stuff that's wrong because it's ALL wrong.
>
> I have the opposite reaction for the same reasons you cite. Also perhaps
> because it's so American; I had similar problems with The West Wing.
Now that's certainly true (about it being "so American") - hadn't thought
of that. But I find it really really funny that the counter-terrorist
unit in LA is one of the least secure facilities on the planet. Kinda
like Torchwood being the least secret secret organisation in the
world. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|