|
 |
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:11:30 -0500, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:31:24 -0500, nemesis wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:46:43 -0500, nemesis wrote:
>>>
>>> > Unless gory details were suppressed by the press in the 20's, 30's,
>>> > 40's, 50's and the lisergic 60's, I think the absence of violent
>>> > acts like this is pretty much non documented. Not just the press:
>>> > I don't recall either movies or books plots dealing about school
>>> > shootings. Pretty much all criminal TV shows have had school
>>> > shootings or civilian sharpshooters in their plots by now.
>>>
>>> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence...
>>
>> really sad seeing a friend go delusional...
>
> Yes, it is sad to see friends go delusional - I have watched it happen.
>
> Now, if you're trying to say that *I'm* delusional, that's another
> matter altogether.
>
> I'm simply stating that just because there isn't evidence doesn't mean
> it didn't happen.
Or rather (and more correctly) since you *haven't seen* the evidence
doesn't mean (a) it didn't happen, and (b) there isn't evidence.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
