scott wrote:
> I suspect that site would have been blocked anyway no matter what its 
> contents were, but the fact that it contains heavy criticism of the very 
> organisation that decides what gets blocked, it's no wonder it's 
> blocked.  I mean even if the owner protests that his site shouldn't be 
> blocked, the officials are likely to put his request to the bottom of 
> the pile and generally do all they can to make sure it stays blocked.

Exactly, in practice that is would any human being with power would to 
to the rest, the "childporn" guy just gave them the perfect excuse to 
sensor him, there are several Parental control software, even modern 
antiviruses comes with it, let The Net FREE! (you fukuing hypocrites 
purists)

Post a reply to this message