scott <sco### [at] laptopcom> wrote:
> I suspect that site would have been blocked anyway no matter what its 
> contents were, but the fact that it contains heavy criticism of the very 
> organisation that decides what gets blocked, it's no wonder it's blocked.  I 
> mean even if the owner protests that his site shouldn't be blocked, the 
> officials are likely to put his request to the bottom of the pile and 
> generally do all they can to make sure it stays blocked.

  Welcome to a totalitarian police state?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message