Warp wrote:

>   Somehow I get the feeling that means:
> 
>   1) If you want to make a program which does some efficient calculations
> using arrays, you have to jump through many useless hoops.
> 
>   2) Haskell is not pure regardless.

Well, you've seen code that does it, so you can see it's really not that 
hard. And the "hoops" are precisely what *makes* Haskell pure. To my 
mind, that makes them not "useless". Still, it is only to my mind... 
obviously what is or is not useful is in the eye of the beholder.

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message