Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> You're right. It isn't. FF is the number one sucker-up-of-useless-memory 
>> -and-cycles on my machines.
> 
>   Yes, everything not made by Microsoft is by definition bad, horrid,
> heavy, a memory-hog and a CPU-hog. Everything made by Microsoft is
> just perfect.

Why do you think I'm saying that? What part of "on my machines" isn't 
clear to you?

You *do* realize that in order for me to be saying this, I'd have to 
actually use firefox on a regular basis, right? If you look at my 
headers, you'll see I'm using thunderbird, and have been since it was 
called "Mozilla 4.x". I haven't opened OE or IE for ... months? Years? 
Outlook is an abomination. Firefox and thunderbird have minor 
annoyances. IE and OE are too dangerous to run.

Happy?

>   You must have a different version of Firefox, as mine is taking 0%
> of CPU time right now.

Depends on what you're surfing, I suppose. Sure, sometimes it works 
great. Sometimes it takes a lot of CPU cycles until I figure out what's 
going on. And you can't tell me you haven't heard people complaining it 
over-buffers stuff.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message