|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> The thing is, the watermark, in order to be meaningful, would have to re-
> encode exactly the same way.
No it wouldn't. People work on watermarks all the time that don't need
precise reencoding.
Xerox worked on systems for watermarking documents that would survive
being photocopied at the wrong size and then faxed, for example.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|