|
 |
somebody wrote:
> "Saul Luizaga" <sau### [at] netscape net> wrote in message
> news:47aeba0a@news.povray.org...
>
>> Point taken. BUT some Google produts are free of ads and are useful
>
> As are a lot of MS products.
>
>>> Say what you want about Microsoft, it's still primarily a software
> company
>>> that creates and sells IT products.
>
>> Which are in many cases slower and sometimes so crappy.
>
> Than what?
Than other products of course.
> How do you measure crappiness?
Does it matter? like everyone else then. I made the comparisions not
only for applications but also for programing languages and components,
so yes MS is A CRAPPY COMPANY, and I don't care if everyone think
otherwise.
>> I've heard so
>> many times saying I'm not using this MS product because is too slow,
>> features are difficult to use, lacks of this and that, the GUI is a
>> mess, this product does better on this and that...
>
> It's natural to say that about the software products you use. I've said that
> about *all* software vendors I dealt with.
you have no judgment criteria then...
> The fact that MS singles out in
> your mind only means that you have used more MS products than other vendors,
> nothing more.
hahaha, like you know my mind and you know exactly what software I have
or not, you're so wrong here in so many levels.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
