On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:57:54 +0100, Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:

>> I'd think that the conversion back and forth would modify an attempt
>> like this enough.  Remember that mp3 encoding is lossy, not lossless.
> 
> Yes, I know. And to overcome that, just don't make the changes to the
> sound THAT small.

The thing is, the watermark, in order to be meaningful, would have to re-
encode exactly the same way.  Otherwise, you end up with a scrambled 
watermark.  So you can maybe tell it was there, but not what it was.

Jim

Post a reply to this message