|
|
Warp wrote:
> Saul Luizaga <sau### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>> As you maight know for $us. 44.6 Billions. I think Yahoo should stay in
>> bussiness what do you think?
>
> Who cares?
>
I'm still trying to figure out why ...
>
> If MS tried to buy the Free Software Foundation, that would be interesting.
>
Don't give them any bright ideas ;)
Though, I seemed to have read somewhere that MS was considering
releasing the source to the .NET framework ....
nevermind, they already have: http://tinyurl.com/2cfh5w
> I hate to defend Windows by principle, but I can't simply deny facts:
> The need for security patches is not a flaw exclusive to Windows, nor one
> can fairly expect an OS of that size to be completely flawless. The Linux
> kernel receives regular security patches, and this is true for most other
> OSes as well (such as Solaris and MacOS X).
>
> What MS should do is to make their OS more efficient, lighter and with
> increased usability. They like to plagiate ideas from MacOS X, but they
> fail to replicate its user-friendliness and robustness.
Well said. Most vulnerabilities crop up because someone found a clever
way to circumvent the normal operation of an application in ways the
original creator of the application never considered.
Post a reply to this message
|
|