Warp wrote:
>   IMO "he" is a perfectly valid gender-neutral third-person pronoun.
> IMO anyone who constructs those artificial "he/she" or whatever
> monstrosities is just being ridiculously over-PC.

	I'm fine with it if you're fine when others use "she" instead.

	Personally, I always wished English had gender-neutral third-person
pronouns that applies to humans. Can't see a downside to it.

-- 
Why is the person who invests all your money called a broker?


                    /\  /\               /\  /
                   /  \/  \ u e e n     /  \/  a w a z
                       >>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
                                   anl

Post a reply to this message