On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:08:02 +0100, andrel wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:31:09 +0100, andrel wrote:
>> 
>>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:43 -0500, Warp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   If that's the case then the original riddle doesn't make any
>>>>>   sense.
>>>>> It's too trivial.
>>>> Well, I disagree with that as well.  Within the confines of the
>>>> riddle itself, asking one question is what's allowed - doing other
>>>> things is undefined within the scope of the riddle.  Being undefined
>>>> doesn't mean it can't be done - most people don't think outside the
>>>> scope of a question being asked, particularly in the case of a
>>>> riddle.
>>>>
>>>> Q.  Why is a duck?
>>>>
>>> With a conical answer of: 'Why the "?"?'?
>> 
>> Conical? ;-)
>> 
>> 
> I did my best to construct a interesting sequence of punctuation
> characters that actually makes sense and then I blow it by such typo. :(

LOL, but given that this is a povray group, "conical" just makes it that 
much funnier. :-)

YKYHBRTTMW.....

Jim

Post a reply to this message