On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:31:09 +0100, andrel wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:43 -0500, Warp wrote:
>> 
>>>   If that's the case then the original riddle doesn't make any sense.
>>> It's too trivial.
>> 
>> Well, I disagree with that as well.  Within the confines of the riddle
>> itself, asking one question is what's allowed - doing other things is
>> undefined within the scope of the riddle.  Being undefined doesn't mean
>> it can't be done - most people don't think outside the scope of a
>> question being asked, particularly in the case of a riddle.
>> 
>> Q.  Why is a duck?
>> 
> With a conical answer of: 'Why the "?"?'?

Conical? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message