Darren New wrote:

> OK, the point *I* was making is that people still remember who Russell 
> is and what he did 100 years ago, while "normal programmers" half the 
> time don't even get their names displayed in the credits of their own 
> creations.

Mmm, OK.

> Just FYI, Russell did for set theory (i.e., the basis of most 
> or all modern math) what Godel and Turing did for their fields.

*resists urge to ask who Godel is*

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message