Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:43 -0500, Warp wrote:
> 
>>   If that's the case then the original riddle doesn't make any sense.
>> It's too trivial.
> 
> Well, I disagree with that as well.  Within the confines of the riddle 
> itself, asking one question is what's allowed - doing other things is 
> undefined within the scope of the riddle.  Being undefined doesn't mean 
> it can't be done - most people don't think outside the scope of a 
> question being asked, particularly in the case of a riddle.
> 
> Q.  Why is a duck?
> 
With a conical answer of: 'Why the "?"?'?

Post a reply to this message