|
|
"Warp" wrote:
> One argument which has always been given is that you
> don't know the screen size of the user, and that some users might want
> to view the page in a small hand-held device.
My site is about high resolution 3D graphics and multimedia applications
mainly. It makes no sense to target hand-held devices, or blind people for
that matter in this case. Rather, on their high resolution monitors, which I
*know* my intended audience have, I want the site to look good.
Turns out lots of other people want their sites to look good too. Sure, many
avoid tables and style markup directly in the content, but they still use
loads of nested divs which have no purpose other than helping control the
look. What I'm saying is that I don't see how using tables is worse that
using all those leyout-specific nested divs.
> (What I find puzzling is that "they" preached separation of content
> and layout from the dawn of the WWW, yet "they" hate CSS
Who does that? I find that most people love CSS, including me... I just take
certain liberties, that's all, but I still would hate to design a site again
without the aid of CSS.
Rune
--
http://runevision.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|