|
 |
>> OTOH, if you've expecting a maximum wave hight of X, you design to
>> withstand 2X, and then suddenly a 12X have hits... hmm, Not Good(tm).
>
> It's impossible to design anything to be 100% sure of lasting a set time
> when it's being attacked by an essentially random force. That's why you
> have models and can choose a chance of it being broken in its lifetime,
> eg 0.1% over 10 years. Of course that means there's a 0.1% chance of a
> >2X wave coming along in 10 years, but what else can you do?
My point being "what happens if the model says force X is the largest
that's ever likely to occur, but it turns out the model is wrong and
actually force 12X is fairly common"... Presumably that's a pretty bad
thing?
>> PS. Don't you ever hit a point where it's not possible to design for
>> 2x the maximum?
>
> It's never impossible, just sometimes too costly or not practical. Then
> you might do some more detailed simulations to bring the 2X figure down
> to 1.5X or something with a suitable level of confidence. Or just think
> up a different way to solve the problem. Usually it comes down to cost
> though.
OK. Cool.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |