|
|
Kevin Wampler wrote:
> I might be remembering incorrectly, but I recalled that something went
> wrong during the first take and they had to try it again. It is one
> uninterrupted shot though, and weather it took one take or two I'm still
> very impressed.
I see - I was misinterpreting the word "take". So it took two takes to
make, but the movie is one long take.
--
To be frank, I'd have to change my name.
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|