|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Also, the recent version of "Pride and Prejudice" (the one with Keira
> Knightley) had some rather long shots in it, with the camera moving
> through various rooms and people / events / conversations coming into
> and out of focus in it. In one scene in particular, I was like "That's
> cool, moving the camera that way... Huh, they haven't cut yet... Wow,
> this is still the same take!" It's the kind of thing you can imagine
> getting all the way to the end, and someone making a dumb mistake and
> ruining the whole shot, but nobody did. I was very impressed by that :)
I've seen a couple of movies which take the long shot to its extreme and
film the entire movie in essentially one uninterrupted shot. There's
Rope by Hitchcock and a more recent film Russian Ark. The former is a
pretty good suspense film, and the latter, while a bit dull, has
absolutely stunning camera work. I'd take a look if you're interested
in that sort of thing. Apparently Russian Ark also took only two takes
to get right, which is very impressive for a movie which is over an hour
and a half long.
Post a reply to this message
|
|