On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:26:40 -0800, Chambers wrote:

> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
>> Chambers wrote:
>>> 2053 was decent when I read it (I think I was 15 at the time).  I
>>> couldn't stomach more than a chapter or two of 3001, however (17yo
>>> when I tried to read it?).
>> 
>> 	I must have missed out on 2053. I read 2061...
>> 
>> 
> That was probably it (how am I supposed to remember a random number
> close to fifteen years later?)

2^2677009:1 against.

(Name that number!)

Jim

Post a reply to this message