Bill Pragnell wrote:
>  3 was good, I liked the 
> puzzle-bombing concept, but it all fell apart a bit towards the end. 

Disagree. The end is what made it all worthwhile: that there was 
something other than just mad-bomber puzzles going on.

> Number 4 was surprisingly good but there was too much to-ing and fro-ing.

Four with the power grid bit? That was awful. The hacker characters knew 
way too much about what was going on. For example, why would the 
computers at the electrical substation know what valves were opening and 
closing in the gas pipes in the next city over?  Dumb stuff like that 
kept pulling me out of it.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message