Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>> Unbreakable wasn't bad, but it wasn't overly good 
> 
>> Way, *way* too long. If they'd chopped out 40 minutes or so, it would 
>> have been excellent.
> 
>   I disagree. If they had chopped 40 minutes then it would simply have
> been a regular hollywood blockbuster.

Could be. And Bruce Willis is good enough you can actually get something 
out of it. I just thought the pace didn't fit the mood. I got bored 
waiting for the next bit. Maybe I was anticipating a twist and hence 
anxious to find out what it was.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message