Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:30:29 +0200, Gail Shaw wrote:
> 
>> Try reading the book. The first sequel's also good, not sure about the
>> other 2.
> 
> There were other sequels?  I only knew about 2010 (which I quite liked).
> 
> Jim

2053 was decent when I read it (I think I was 15 at the time).  I 
couldn't stomach more than a chapter or two of 3001, however (17yo when 
I tried to read it?).

It just seemed like preachy atheist propoganda written for 5 year olds. 
  Mind you, that was only the first two chapters - I never read the rest :)

-- 
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message