|
|
Warp wrote:
> Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
>> But still, if you're lucky enough to see two or three trailers for a
>> movie
>
> ... you have already seen the movie, so there's really no need to watch
> it again. That's my opinion.
>
> There aren't many things I detest more about movies than trailers.
> They spoil way too much.
>
> Just today there was a good example. I went to see a movie in the theater,
> and before it they showed the trailer for the new National Treasure movie,
> and it spoiled an incredible amount of the contents of the movie. And mind
> you, I wasn't *watching* anything of it.
>
A good movie is worth watching even if you know what's going to happen.
Or why else do people still go to see Shakespeare's plays?
"Romeo and Juliet? Why would I want to see that when I already know
they both die at the end?"
Case in point: The Sixth Sense. The ending was "spoiled" for me before
I ever saw it. Even so, I found it to be an excellent movie, and was
still able to appreciate it.
Personally, I think that if a movie is only enjoyable the first time you
watch it, then you shouldn't watch it at all.
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|