andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I answered a question in a reply to you that was intended for me. After 
> that I answered a question to you that belonged in another subthread. I 
> see no reason for confusion ;)

> Ah a proof by reductio ad absurdum, conclusion: Dutch papers are 
> different from Swedish.

> So all losers go to Scandinavia and we keep the slightly better lot, 
> interesting.

  As always, there just is no discussing with you. So I'll stop.

  Conversation implies trying to understand what the other is saying,
not trying to constantly undermine every single point he is presenting.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message